The creative model reference

AI models for motion design

Reference results for motion design, graphics and structured visual movement.

September 2026 benchmark snapshot · Curated by Oakgen. Data source and limits.

video / Motion Design

The scores, in perspective.

11 models · 95% intervals

Swipe to compare all models →

Oakgen Arena · v1.0

11,097

Seedance 2.5

21,038

Seedance 2.0

31,030

Wan 3.0

41,001

Seedance 2.0 Mini

51,000

MiniMax H3Anchor

6993

Google Omni Flash

7950

Flux 3 Video

8936

HappyHorse 1.1

9913

Grok Imagine 1.5

10885

PixVerse V6

11867

Kling 3.0 Omni

↥ 95% confidence interval · Anchor interval not reported.11 ranked models

Relative scores on a zero-based display scale. Compare within this board only. Values are rounded for display.

September 2026 benchmark snapshot · Curated by Oakgen. Data source and limits.

Published reference / v1.0

Motion Design leaderboard

Motion Design video rankings · Benchmark index 1.0
Rank	Model	Overall score	95% confidence interval	Vote appearances	Distinct judges
01	Seedance 2.5ByteDance Criterion scores Audio quality1,178.195% CI 1,128.4 to 1,228.7Reused fit from master-video Consistency1,194.795% CI 1,151.8 to 1,243.3Reused fit from master-video Design fidelity1,037.995% CI 968.4 to 1,115.6 Motion control1,115.895% CI 1,020.7 to 1,197.5 Physics & motion1,103.695% CI 1,068.6 to 1,137.4Reused fit from master-video Prompt adherence1,052.695% CI 1,014.6 to 1,088.4Reused fit from master-video Spatial composition1,101.995% CI 1,021.2 to 1,198.6 Subjective aesthetics1,096.495% CI 1,061.3 to 1,131.1Reused fit from master-video	1,097.2LEAD	1,061.5 to 1,135	4,295	Not reported
02	Seedance 2.0ByteDance Criterion scores Audio quality1,102.895% CI 1,063.5 to 1,140.8Reused fit from master-video Consistency1,060.895% CI 1,022.7 to 1,099Reused fit from master-video Design fidelity1,045.795% CI 978.9 to 1,122 Motion control1,02195% CI 941.7 to 1,102.1 Physics & motion1,036.195% CI 1,002.3 to 1,069.3Reused fit from master-video Prompt adherence1,050.595% CI 1,017.4 to 1,084.1Reused fit from master-video Spatial composition1,038.595% CI 957 to 1,117.1 Subjective aesthetics971.895% CI 935.7 to 1,010.3Reused fit from master-video	1,037.9#2	1,006.8 to 1,069	4,376	Not reported
03	Wan 3.0Alibaba Criterion scores Audio quality1,059.695% CI 1,022.9 to 1,100.1Reused fit from master-video Consistency1,121.595% CI 1,080.6 to 1,165.8Reused fit from master-video Design fidelity970.495% CI 893.8 to 1,053.6 Motion control1,022.595% CI 936.9 to 1,095.4 Physics & motion1,026.795% CI 993 to 1,058.4Reused fit from master-video Prompt adherence980.895% CI 940.2 to 1,021.2Reused fit from master-video Spatial composition1,077.195% CI 1,002 to 1,151.2 Subjective aesthetics1,044.395% CI 1,006.5 to 1,083.1Reused fit from master-video	1,030.3#3	998.7 to 1,061.7	4,320	Not reported
04	Seedance 2.0 MiniByteDance Criterion scores Audio quality1,127.895% CI 1,085.5 to 1,172.8Reused fit from master-video Consistency1,03495% CI 997.3 to 1,069.8Reused fit from master-video Design fidelity930.995% CI 876.3 to 990.7 Motion control1,00995% CI 946.3 to 1,073.3 Physics & motion1,024.495% CI 991.6 to 1,059.6Reused fit from master-video Prompt adherence971.495% CI 937.1 to 1,002.7Reused fit from master-video Spatial composition1,020.695% CI 931.3 to 1,096.8 Subjective aesthetics1,008.595% CI 972.9 to 1,048.3Reused fit from master-video	1,000.7	970.2 to 1,028.8	4,386	Not reported
05	MiniMax H3MiniMax Criterion scores Audio quality1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reportedReused fit from master-video Consistency1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reportedReused fit from master-video Design fidelity1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported Motion control1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported Physics & motion1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reportedReused fit from master-video Prompt adherence1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reportedReused fit from master-video Spatial composition1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported Subjective aesthetics1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reportedReused fit from master-video	1,000Anchor	Anchor · interval not reported	4,350	Not reported
06	Google Omni FlashGoogle Criterion scores Audio quality1,108.895% CI 1,065.6 to 1,152.5Reused fit from master-video Consistency995.495% CI 956 to 1,033.9Reused fit from master-video Design fidelity1,095.895% CI 1,023.7 to 1,181 Motion control91295% CI 840.3 to 982.1 Physics & motion98395% CI 949.1 to 1,020.3Reused fit from master-video Prompt adherence977.295% CI 942.3 to 1,010.9Reused fit from master-video Spatial composition924.295% CI 811.5 to 1,037.8 Subjective aesthetics1,081.695% CI 1,041.6 to 1,123.6Reused fit from master-video	992.9	955.3 to 1,030.9	4,327	Not reported
07	Flux 3 VideoBlack Forest Labs Criterion scores Audio quality1,078.195% CI 1,036.8 to 1,122.5Reused fit from master-video Consistency96395% CI 929.3 to 994.1Reused fit from master-video Design fidelity902.695% CI 822 to 983.9 Motion control911.995% CI 825.6 to 986.4 Physics & motion994.695% CI 963.3 to 1,028.8Reused fit from master-video Prompt adherence979.195% CI 947.2 to 1,011.5Reused fit from master-video Spatial composition968.795% CI 879.2 to 1,063.2 Subjective aesthetics1,000.995% CI 963.9 to 1,038.2Reused fit from master-video	950.4	914.9 to 984.8	4,413	Not reported
08	HappyHorse 1.1HappyHorse Criterion scores Audio quality1,000.195% CI 962.1 to 1,042.4Reused fit from master-video Consistency994.495% CI 956.8 to 1,030.8Reused fit from master-video Design fidelity87795% CI 809.3 to 937.5 Motion control908.295% CI 822.3 to 989.6 Physics & motion960.295% CI 928.1 to 993.1Reused fit from master-video Prompt adherence944.895% CI 903.6 to 982.1Reused fit from master-video Spatial composition968.295% CI 896.1 to 1,045.7 Subjective aesthetics985.695% CI 950 to 1,022.2Reused fit from master-video	935.5	903.3 to 964.4	4,327	Not reported
09	Grok Imagine 1.5xAI Criterion scores Audio quality904.795% CI 863.9 to 944.8Reused fit from master-video Consistency1,050.895% CI 1,014 to 1,090.3Reused fit from master-video Design fidelity886.695% CI 821.2 to 954.7 Motion control87995% CI 798.2 to 951.4 Physics & motion925.195% CI 885.9 to 958.7Reused fit from master-video Prompt adherence94395% CI 906.9 to 982.2Reused fit from master-video Spatial composition90995% CI 835.7 to 977.5 Subjective aesthetics99395% CI 963.3 to 1,027.5Reused fit from master-video	913.1	882.6 to 941.7	4,339	Not reported
10	PixVerse V6PixVerse Criterion scores Audio quality977.295% CI 940.8 to 1,012.5Reused fit from master-video Consistency990.195% CI 946.9 to 1,031.7Reused fit from master-video Design fidelity840.195% CI 766.2 to 915.4 Motion control821.695% CI 745.3 to 896.5 Physics & motion935.395% CI 893.1 to 972.7Reused fit from master-video Prompt adherence88495% CI 838.3 to 926Reused fit from master-video Spatial composition905.295% CI 810.8 to 989.2 Subjective aesthetics979.995% CI 943.6 to 1,014.5Reused fit from master-video	884.9	852.1 to 917	4,355	Not reported
11	Kling 3.0 OmniKuaishou Criterion scores Audio quality1,053.595% CI 1,007.9 to 1,099.6Reused fit from master-video Consistency1,041.995% CI 999 to 1,083.2Reused fit from master-video Design fidelity786.195% CI 718.2 to 856.3 Motion control777.695% CI 691.3 to 851.7 Physics & motion884.495% CI 842.6 to 921.2Reused fit from master-video Prompt adherence962.995% CI 920.5 to 1,002.9Reused fit from master-video Spatial composition891.995% CI 802.4 to 979.5 Subjective aesthetics954.795% CI 917.5 to 990.5Reused fit from master-video	866.8	832.6 to 898.1	4,340	Not reported

Ranks are the source’s published positions. Vote appearances are not unique people and must not be added across boards. Scores are rounded for display.

September 2026 benchmark snapshot · Curated by Oakgen. Data source and limits.

From comparison to creation

Choose for your brief.

Check alignment, readable type and the exact timing of transitions. Build a short test around the hardest movement in your design. Leave space for a finishing pass when text, brand marks or precise geometry must remain exact.

Explore Oakgen's model directory

A source listing does not confirm current availability in Oakgen.

How this board is composed

Criteria and weights

Spatial composition23.3%
Motion control23.3%
Physics & motion6%
Design fidelity23.3%
Prompt adherence6%
Audio quality6%
Consistency6%
Subjective aesthetics6%

Read the methodology