The creative model reference

AI video model rankings

Compare the published overall results for AI video generation. Read the score together with its uncertainty before choosing a model for your next project.

September 2026 benchmark snapshot · Curated by Oakgen. Data source and limits.

video / Overall

The scores, in perspective.

11 models · 95% intervals

Swipe to compare all models →

Oakgen Arena · v1.0

11,125

Seedance 2.5

21,047

Wan 3.0

31,044

Seedance 2.0

41,033

Seedance 2.0 Mini

51,029

Google Omni Flash

61,003

Flux 3 Video

71,000

MiniMax H3Anchor

8979

Kling 3.0 Omni

9977

HappyHorse 1.1

10963

Grok Imagine 1.5

11953

PixVerse V6

↥ 95% confidence interval · Anchor interval not reported.11 ranked models

Relative scores on a zero-based display scale. Compare within this board only. Values are rounded for display.

September 2026 benchmark snapshot · Curated by Oakgen. Data source and limits.

Published reference / v1.0

Overall leaderboard

Overall video rankings · Benchmark index 1.0
Rank	Model	Overall score	95% confidence interval	Vote appearances	Distinct judges
01	Seedance 2.5ByteDance Criterion scores Audio quality1,178.195% CI 1,128.4 to 1,228.7 Consistency1,194.795% CI 1,151.8 to 1,243.3 Physics & motion1,103.695% CI 1,068.6 to 1,137.4 Prompt adherence1,052.695% CI 1,014.6 to 1,088.4 Subjective aesthetics1,096.495% CI 1,061.3 to 1,131.1	1,125.1LEAD	1,107.5 to 1,144	3,831	Not reported
02	Wan 3.0Alibaba Criterion scores Audio quality1,059.695% CI 1,022.9 to 1,100.1 Consistency1,121.595% CI 1,080.6 to 1,165.8 Physics & motion1,026.795% CI 993 to 1,058.4 Prompt adherence980.895% CI 940.2 to 1,021.2 Subjective aesthetics1,044.395% CI 1,006.5 to 1,083.1	1,046.6#2	1,030.3 to 1,063.8	3,823	Not reported
03	Seedance 2.0ByteDance Criterion scores Audio quality1,102.895% CI 1,063.5 to 1,140.8 Consistency1,060.895% CI 1,022.7 to 1,099 Physics & motion1,036.195% CI 1,002.3 to 1,069.3 Prompt adherence1,050.595% CI 1,017.4 to 1,084.1 Subjective aesthetics971.895% CI 935.7 to 1,010.3	1,044.4#3	1,027.3 to 1,061.3	3,864	Not reported
04	Seedance 2.0 MiniByteDance Criterion scores Audio quality1,127.895% CI 1,085.5 to 1,172.8 Consistency1,03495% CI 997.3 to 1,069.8 Physics & motion1,024.495% CI 991.6 to 1,059.6 Prompt adherence971.495% CI 937.1 to 1,002.7 Subjective aesthetics1,008.595% CI 972.9 to 1,048.3	1,033.2	1,015.8 to 1,050.5	3,871	Not reported
05	Google Omni FlashGoogle Criterion scores Audio quality1,108.895% CI 1,065.6 to 1,152.5 Consistency995.495% CI 956 to 1,033.9 Physics & motion98395% CI 949.1 to 1,020.3 Prompt adherence977.295% CI 942.3 to 1,010.9 Subjective aesthetics1,081.695% CI 1,041.6 to 1,123.6	1,029.2	1,011.3 to 1,046.3	3,841	Not reported
06	Flux 3 VideoBlack Forest Labs Criterion scores Audio quality1,078.195% CI 1,036.8 to 1,122.5 Consistency96395% CI 929.3 to 994.1 Physics & motion994.695% CI 963.3 to 1,028.8 Prompt adherence979.195% CI 947.2 to 1,011.5 Subjective aesthetics1,000.995% CI 963.9 to 1,038.2	1,003.1	986.5 to 1,018.8	3,915	Not reported
07	MiniMax H3MiniMax Criterion scores Audio quality1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported Consistency1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported Physics & motion1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported Prompt adherence1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported Subjective aesthetics1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported	1,000Anchor	Anchor · interval not reported	3,858	Not reported
08	Kling 3.0 OmniKuaishou Criterion scores Audio quality1,053.595% CI 1,007.9 to 1,099.6 Consistency1,041.995% CI 999 to 1,083.2 Physics & motion884.495% CI 842.6 to 921.2 Prompt adherence962.995% CI 920.5 to 1,002.9 Subjective aesthetics954.795% CI 917.5 to 990.5	979.5	960.4 to 997	3,843	Not reported
09	HappyHorse 1.1HappyHorse Criterion scores Audio quality1,000.195% CI 962.1 to 1,042.4 Consistency994.495% CI 956.8 to 1,030.8 Physics & motion960.295% CI 928.1 to 993.1 Prompt adherence944.895% CI 903.6 to 982.1 Subjective aesthetics985.695% CI 950 to 1,022.2	977	959 to 993.3	3,834	Not reported
10	Grok Imagine 1.5xAI Criterion scores Audio quality904.795% CI 863.9 to 944.8 Consistency1,050.895% CI 1,014 to 1,090.3 Physics & motion925.195% CI 885.9 to 958.7 Prompt adherence94395% CI 906.9 to 982.2 Subjective aesthetics99395% CI 963.3 to 1,027.5	963.3	946.8 to 980.3	3,841	Not reported
11	PixVerse V6PixVerse Criterion scores Audio quality977.295% CI 940.8 to 1,012.5 Consistency990.195% CI 946.9 to 1,031.7 Physics & motion935.395% CI 893.1 to 972.7 Prompt adherence88495% CI 838.3 to 926 Subjective aesthetics979.995% CI 943.6 to 1,014.5	953.3	935 to 970.7	3,853	Not reported

Ranks are the source’s published positions. Vote appearances are not unique people and must not be added across boards. Scores are rounded for display.

September 2026 benchmark snapshot · Curated by Oakgen. Data source and limits.

From comparison to creation

Choose for your brief.

Start with the overall comparison, then choose the board closest to your brief. Test the same scene, camera movement and duration in your own workflow. A model that suits a short product shot may behave differently on a longer narrative sequence.

Explore Oakgen's model directory

A source listing does not confirm current availability in Oakgen.

How this board is composed

Criteria and weights

Consistency20%
Audio quality20%
Physics & motion20%
Prompt adherence20%
Subjective aesthetics20%

Read the methodology