The creative model reference

AI video models for ads

A task-specific reference for advertising and commercial video. Compare this board when your brief centers on a product, a message or a campaign.

September 2026 benchmark snapshot · Curated by Oakgen. Data source and limits.

video / Ads

The scores, in perspective.

11 models · 95% intervals

Swipe to compare all models →

Oakgen Arena · v1.0

11,072

Seedance 2.5

21,043

Wan 3.0

31,031

Seedance 2.0

41,010

Google Omni Flash

51,000

MiniMax H3Anchor

6990

Seedance 2.0 Mini

7981

HappyHorse 1.1

8971

Flux 3 Video

9944

Grok Imagine 1.5

10939

Kling 3.0 Omni

11910

PixVerse V6

↥ 95% confidence interval · Anchor interval not reported.11 ranked models

Relative scores on a zero-based display scale. Compare within this board only. Values are rounded for display.

September 2026 benchmark snapshot · Curated by Oakgen. Data source and limits.

Published reference / v1.0

Ads leaderboard

Ads video rankings · Benchmark index 1.0
Rank	Model	Overall score	95% confidence interval	Vote appearances	Distinct judges
01	Seedance 2.5ByteDance Criterion scores Audio quality1,178.195% CI 1,128.4 to 1,228.7Reused fit from master-video Consistency1,194.795% CI 1,151.8 to 1,243.3Reused fit from master-video Physics & motion1,103.695% CI 1,068.6 to 1,137.4Reused fit from master-video Product/brand consistency1,044.195% CI 1,005.6 to 1,083.2 Prompt adherence1,052.695% CI 1,014.6 to 1,088.4Reused fit from master-video Realism1,047.995% CI 1,002.7 to 1,097 Scene-product logic1,058.895% CI 1,011.3 to 1,106.5 Subjective aesthetics1,096.495% CI 1,061.3 to 1,131.1Reused fit from master-video Text/logo rendering accuracy1,048.295% CI 1,008.6 to 1,085.9	1,072.3LEAD	1,055.8 to 1,089.4	5,205	Not reported
02	Wan 3.0Alibaba Criterion scores Audio quality1,059.695% CI 1,022.9 to 1,100.1Reused fit from master-video Consistency1,121.595% CI 1,080.6 to 1,165.8Reused fit from master-video Physics & motion1,026.795% CI 993 to 1,058.4Reused fit from master-video Product/brand consistency1,069.295% CI 1,015.6 to 1,124.7 Prompt adherence980.895% CI 940.2 to 1,021.2Reused fit from master-video Realism1,03395% CI 984.2 to 1,094.5 Scene-product logic1,030.995% CI 980.3 to 1,082.6 Subjective aesthetics1,044.395% CI 1,006.5 to 1,083.1Reused fit from master-video Text/logo rendering accuracy1,031.995% CI 977 to 1,084.3	1,042.9#2	1,025.5 to 1,062.2	5,181	Not reported
03	Seedance 2.0ByteDance Criterion scores Audio quality1,102.895% CI 1,063.5 to 1,140.8Reused fit from master-video Consistency1,060.895% CI 1,022.7 to 1,099Reused fit from master-video Physics & motion1,036.195% CI 1,002.3 to 1,069.3Reused fit from master-video Product/brand consistency1,055.995% CI 997.4 to 1,109.6 Prompt adherence1,050.595% CI 1,017.4 to 1,084.1Reused fit from master-video Realism1,053.595% CI 1,002.9 to 1,117.7 Scene-product logic975.295% CI 917.5 to 1,036.1 Subjective aesthetics971.895% CI 935.7 to 1,010.3Reused fit from master-video Text/logo rendering accuracy1,015.995% CI 954.9 to 1,071.5	1,030.9#3	1,011.5 to 1,053.3	5,206	Not reported
04	Google Omni FlashGoogle Criterion scores Audio quality1,108.895% CI 1,065.6 to 1,152.5Reused fit from master-video Consistency995.495% CI 956 to 1,033.9Reused fit from master-video Physics & motion98395% CI 949.1 to 1,020.3Reused fit from master-video Product/brand consistency96595% CI 907.6 to 1,019.6 Prompt adherence977.295% CI 942.3 to 1,010.9Reused fit from master-video Realism996.695% CI 950.1 to 1,054 Scene-product logic1,031.395% CI 975.6 to 1,087.4 Subjective aesthetics1,081.695% CI 1,041.6 to 1,123.6Reused fit from master-video Text/logo rendering accuracy1,013.195% CI 957.3 to 1,068.5	1,009.8	990.4 to 1,029.5	5,189	Not reported
05	MiniMax H3MiniMax Criterion scores Audio quality1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reportedReused fit from master-video Consistency1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reportedReused fit from master-video Physics & motion1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reportedReused fit from master-video Product/brand consistency1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported Prompt adherence1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reportedReused fit from master-video Realism1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported Scene-product logic1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported Subjective aesthetics1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reportedReused fit from master-video Text/logo rendering accuracy1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported	1,000Anchor	Anchor · interval not reported	5,202	Not reported
06	Seedance 2.0 MiniByteDance Criterion scores Audio quality1,127.895% CI 1,085.5 to 1,172.8Reused fit from master-video Consistency1,03495% CI 997.3 to 1,069.8Reused fit from master-video Physics & motion1,024.495% CI 991.6 to 1,059.6Reused fit from master-video Product/brand consistency1,015.295% CI 966.2 to 1,064.2 Prompt adherence971.495% CI 937.1 to 1,002.7Reused fit from master-video Realism950.795% CI 906 to 996.1 Scene-product logic98295% CI 925.4 to 1,040.4 Subjective aesthetics1,008.595% CI 972.9 to 1,048.3Reused fit from master-video Text/logo rendering accuracy935.895% CI 884.5 to 986.3	989.6	970.6 to 1,008.7	5,210	Not reported
07	HappyHorse 1.1HappyHorse Criterion scores Audio quality1,000.195% CI 962.1 to 1,042.4Reused fit from master-video Consistency994.495% CI 956.8 to 1,030.8Reused fit from master-video Physics & motion960.295% CI 928.1 to 993.1Reused fit from master-video Product/brand consistency997.795% CI 941.5 to 1,049.3 Prompt adherence944.895% CI 903.6 to 982.1Reused fit from master-video Realism965.495% CI 916.7 to 1,009.5 Scene-product logic97795% CI 914.3 to 1,035.5 Subjective aesthetics985.695% CI 950 to 1,022.2Reused fit from master-video Text/logo rendering accuracy992.995% CI 946.3 to 1,037.8	981.4	960.4 to 1,000	5,164	Not reported
08	Flux 3 VideoBlack Forest Labs Criterion scores Audio quality1,078.195% CI 1,036.8 to 1,122.5Reused fit from master-video Consistency96395% CI 929.3 to 994.1Reused fit from master-video Physics & motion994.695% CI 963.3 to 1,028.8Reused fit from master-video Product/brand consistency959.495% CI 902.9 to 1,009.9 Prompt adherence979.195% CI 947.2 to 1,011.5Reused fit from master-video Realism968.895% CI 914.4 to 1,036 Scene-product logic1,016.895% CI 960.2 to 1,074.3 Subjective aesthetics1,000.995% CI 963.9 to 1,038.2Reused fit from master-video Text/logo rendering accuracy886.195% CI 829.7 to 942.8	971.4	951.1 to 991.7	5,229	Not reported
09	Grok Imagine 1.5xAI Criterion scores Audio quality904.795% CI 863.9 to 944.8Reused fit from master-video Consistency1,050.895% CI 1,014 to 1,090.3Reused fit from master-video Physics & motion925.195% CI 885.9 to 958.7Reused fit from master-video Product/brand consistency914.695% CI 854.1 to 967.9 Prompt adherence94395% CI 906.9 to 982.2Reused fit from master-video Realism955.395% CI 917.5 to 997.6 Scene-product logic1,009.495% CI 958.9 to 1,058.1 Subjective aesthetics99395% CI 963.3 to 1,027.5Reused fit from master-video Text/logo rendering accuracy866.295% CI 794.4 to 928.8	944.5	923.6 to 964.9	5,186	Not reported
10	Kling 3.0 OmniKuaishou Criterion scores Audio quality1,053.595% CI 1,007.9 to 1,099.6Reused fit from master-video Consistency1,041.995% CI 999 to 1,083.2Reused fit from master-video Physics & motion884.495% CI 842.6 to 921.2Reused fit from master-video Product/brand consistency943.195% CI 877.1 to 997.7 Prompt adherence962.995% CI 920.5 to 1,002.9Reused fit from master-video Realism932.895% CI 875.3 to 995.7 Scene-product logic908.395% CI 853.5 to 963.1 Subjective aesthetics954.795% CI 917.5 to 990.5Reused fit from master-video Text/logo rendering accuracy901.395% CI 844.5 to 956.7	938.8	917.7 to 958	5,178	Not reported
11	PixVerse V6PixVerse Criterion scores Audio quality977.295% CI 940.8 to 1,012.5Reused fit from master-video Consistency990.195% CI 946.9 to 1,031.7Reused fit from master-video Physics & motion935.395% CI 893.1 to 972.7Reused fit from master-video Product/brand consistency882.195% CI 835.8 to 930.8 Prompt adherence88495% CI 838.3 to 926Reused fit from master-video Realism924.695% CI 877.2 to 973.7 Scene-product logic887.895% CI 829.7 to 943.7 Subjective aesthetics979.995% CI 943.6 to 1,014.5Reused fit from master-video Text/logo rendering accuracy871.695% CI 802 to 935.2	910.1	888.3 to 928.6	5,190	Not reported

Ranks are the source’s published positions. Vote appearances are not unique people and must not be added across boards. Scores are rounded for display.

September 2026 benchmark snapshot · Curated by Oakgen. Data source and limits.

From comparison to creation

Choose for your brief.

For an ad, check product identity, the first few seconds and whether the action leaves room for your message. Review logo and packaging fidelity separately. The published preference score is not a prediction of conversion rate or campaign performance.

Explore Oakgen's model directory

A source listing does not confirm current availability in Oakgen.

How this board is composed

Criteria and weights

Realism17.5%
Text/logo rendering accuracy17.5%
Physics & motion6%
Scene-product logic17.5%
Consistency6%
Audio quality6%
Prompt adherence6%
Product/brand consistency17.5%
Subjective aesthetics6%

Read the methodology