The creative model reference

AI image models for product photography

Compare the product and e-commerce board for product visuals and merchandising tasks.

September 2026 benchmark snapshot · Curated by Oakgen. Data source and limits.

image / Product / E-commerce

The scores, in perspective.

7 models · 95% intervals

Swipe to compare all models →

Oakgen Arena · v1.0

11,025

Seedream 5.0 Pro

21,023

GPT Image 2

31,014

Nano Banana 2

41,008

Nano Banana Pro

51,000

Grok Imagine 2.0Anchor

6940

Qwen Image 3.0

7931

Flux.2 Pro

↥ 95% confidence interval · Anchor interval not reported.7 ranked models

Relative scores on a zero-based display scale. Compare within this board only. Values are rounded for display.

September 2026 benchmark snapshot · Curated by Oakgen. Data source and limits.

Published reference / v1.0

Product / E-commerce leaderboard

Product / E-commerce image rankings · Benchmark index 1.0
Rank	Model	Overall score	95% confidence interval	Vote appearances	Distinct judges
01	Seedream 5.0 ProByteDance Criterion scores Creativity / variation1,102.695% CI 1,050.6 to 1,156.5Reused fit from master-image Product/brand consistency1,004.195% CI 934.3 to 1,084.8 Prompt adherence1,022.295% CI 982.2 to 1,060.8Reused fit from master-image Realism99195% CI 925.4 to 1,054.3 Reference adherence1,036.795% CI 988.2 to 1,080Reused fit from master-image Subjective aesthetics1,042.895% CI 990.5 to 1,095.7Reused fit from master-image Text/logo rendering accuracy1,044.795% CI 942.4 to 1,143.8	1,024.6LEAD	991.7 to 1,057.3	2,577	Not reported
02	GPT Image 2OpenAI Criterion scores Creativity / variation1,081.995% CI 1,037.4 to 1,128.3Reused fit from master-image Product/brand consistency1,019.795% CI 944 to 1,101.8 Prompt adherence1,041.595% CI 1,010.7 to 1,074.8Reused fit from master-image Realism98195% CI 921.2 to 1,048.7 Reference adherence1,035.395% CI 987 to 1,083.2Reused fit from master-image Subjective aesthetics1,030.195% CI 987.2 to 1,071.2Reused fit from master-image Text/logo rendering accuracy1,035.895% CI 961.9 to 1,118.7	1,022.7#2	992.4 to 1,055.9	2,547	Not reported
03	Nano Banana 2Google Criterion scores Creativity / variation972.695% CI 913.5 to 1,028.8Reused fit from master-image Product/brand consistency967.495% CI 906.5 to 1,032.5 Prompt adherence977.395% CI 937.4 to 1,017.6Reused fit from master-image Realism1,019.995% CI 951.8 to 1,088.3 Reference adherence990.895% CI 945.5 to 1,039.8Reused fit from master-image Subjective aesthetics1,000.495% CI 954 to 1,052.4Reused fit from master-image Text/logo rendering accuracy1,092.795% CI 977.4 to 1,207.1	1,014.3#3	977.4 to 1,049.5	2,586	Not reported
04	Nano Banana ProGoogle Criterion scores Creativity / variation1,032.295% CI 978.2 to 1,084.8Reused fit from master-image Product/brand consistency1,019.295% CI 943.7 to 1,102.1 Prompt adherence1,018.395% CI 978.4 to 1,058.1Reused fit from master-image Realism1,001.195% CI 928.2 to 1,077.2 Reference adherence1,002.295% CI 948.1 to 1,052.2Reused fit from master-image Subjective aesthetics981.195% CI 930.5 to 1,027.6Reused fit from master-image Text/logo rendering accuracy1,004.195% CI 882 to 1,130.1	1,008.2	971.4 to 1,049	2,604	Not reported
05	Grok Imagine 2.0xAI Criterion scores Creativity / variation1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reportedReused fit from master-image Product/brand consistency1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported Prompt adherence1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reportedReused fit from master-image Realism1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported Reference adherence1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reportedReused fit from master-image Subjective aesthetics1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reportedReused fit from master-image Text/logo rendering accuracy1,00095% CI Anchor · interval not reported	1,000Anchor	Anchor · interval not reported	2,594	Not reported
06	Qwen Image 3.0Alibaba Criterion scores Creativity / variation997.195% CI 949.8 to 1,047.1Reused fit from master-image Product/brand consistency937.195% CI 846.1 to 1,031.3 Prompt adherence915.195% CI 880.5 to 949.6Reused fit from master-image Realism909.995% CI 841.3 to 971.5 Reference adherence973.295% CI 921.3 to 1,028.5Reused fit from master-image Subjective aesthetics979.495% CI 928.4 to 1,035.8Reused fit from master-image Text/logo rendering accuracy938.995% CI 880.4 to 1,011.5	939.9	908.8 to 972.9	2,567	Not reported
07	Flux.2 ProBlack Forest Labs Criterion scores Creativity / variation909.695% CI 857.1 to 961.2Reused fit from master-image Product/brand consistency904.795% CI 833.3 to 987.3 Prompt adherence940.995% CI 907.8 to 976.6Reused fit from master-image Realism922.595% CI 848.1 to 1,005.5 Reference adherence881.195% CI 833.9 to 927.5Reused fit from master-image Subjective aesthetics977.795% CI 921.3 to 1,028.8Reused fit from master-image Text/logo rendering accuracy971.295% CI 878.9 to 1,091	931.2	898.5 to 970.7	2,567	Not reported

Ranks are the source’s published positions. Vote appearances are not unique people and must not be added across boards. Scores are rounded for display.

September 2026 benchmark snapshot · Curated by Oakgen. Data source and limits.

From comparison to creation

Choose for your brief.

Inspect shape, materials, labels and small product details at full size. Keep product truth separate from how polished the scene looks. Test several compositions before selecting a model for a catalogue or campaign.

Compare your own image prompt

A source listing does not confirm current availability in Oakgen.

How this board is composed

Criteria and weights

Text/logo rendering accuracy23.3%
Product/brand consistency23.3%
Prompt adherence7.5%
Subjective aesthetics7.5%
Creativity / variation7.5%
Reference adherence7.5%
Realism23.3%

Read the methodology